The Dummy Country’s Guide to Becoming a Nation

Kuan Yew keeps appearing in the media, always sharing with us his clichéd wisdom in his inimitable style of attaching an appearance of weight to the most vacuous words with his ability to disguise feathers as boulders. When he says that the PAP will be voted out if it deteriorates, he means nothing. Though it does beg the question of whether something that is not worth a cent could depreciate in value. Such a statement is as good as Wong Kan Seng saying that Mas Selamat had either fled Singapore or was still in Singapore except it must have sounded so inspiring that local papers deem it necessary to make front page headlines of the non-existent issue. Kuan Yew wants us to think that if the PAP stays in power, it must have governed the country well. Which appears to me to be pure nonsense because we know that there are more ways of staying in power than governing a country well.

But let’s give Kuan Yew a chance. We should not be so harsh on the elderly. Let’s just say that if the PAP, after decades of being uninterrupted leadership, wants to show that it has governed the country well, it should prove to us its worth instead of feeding us the third-world-to-first nonsense day after day. And since Kuan Yew seems to think that if the PAP does not govern Singapore well, it will not stay in power, let’s wait for the PAP to either prove its worth or fall out of power. The best way for the PAP to prove its worth is to turn Singapore into a nation.

When Kuan Yew says that Singapore is not (yet) a nation, he is regurgitating his old vomit and yet journalists seem to enjoy the taste of it enough to eat it up and impose it on the nation that is not one. What one would find interesting though is Kuan Yew KPI for nationhood. He thinks that Singapore would be a nation when Singaporeans will die for one another. This is one interesting idea that requires severe contemplation.

Let us not argue about whether it is true that Singaporeans need to die for Singaporeans before the absurd entity between Malaysia and Indonesia can be considered a nation state. There are many ways to define nationhood and it is not productive to argue about ways to define a construct that is essentially indefinable. It is about as useless as trying to convince everyone that one definition of femininity is The Definition of femininity (though everyone knows that Molly is the universal epitome of femininity, which is clearly something very good to have in a woman). And if we do not argue about the standard that Kuan Yew has set, we should just examine its implications and work towards nationhood—even if it’s for no other reason than to please him.

It is, first and foremost, reasonable to believe even in what Kuan Yew consider to be a nation, not everyone in the nation would be willing to die for their fellow citizens. Secondly, we need to acknowledge that we will not be able to tell if a person is willing to die for others unless he dies for others. After all, even Molly can claim to be willing to die for Singapore when all she really wants to do is to emigrate from the blossoming latrine that is apparently on its way to being a nation. These two ideas are important. It means that at least one Singaporean has to die for Singaporeans before we can prove that Singapore is a notion. Indeed, one Singaporean dying for others may not mean that there are enough Singaporeans willing to do the same. However, we clearly cannot require every Singaporean to die, regardless of their willingness, to prove that Singapore is a nation. We cannot even require every willing Singaporean to die. Otherwise the nation will cease to exist the moment it proves itself to be a nation. In short, we need, on the one hand, many Singaporeans who are willing to die for their fellowmen for Singapore to be considered a nation; and, on the other hand, we cannot test every single Singaporean because the Quality Check will destroy the product. We can only go by probability, so we need at least one person to die for Singaporeans before we have some proof that Singapore is a nation.

We may also want to say that acts of sacrifice are often inspirational. One person who sacrifices himself for others may inspire the same altruism in others, whether or not there is a chance to translate such altruism into action. It would be exceptionally impactful if the person is not some random Sue, Mary or Molly.

What I would propose, then, is for Kuan Yew to die. For the sake of Singaporeans, just die. A final act that would transform Singapore-nation from work in progress to work virtually completed. For Kuan Yew is an important leadership figure, the founding oppressor of Singapore. We know from common rhetoric that leaders should lead by example and when they do, others will model themselves after them. If Kuan Yew dies for the sake of Singaporeans instead of standing for the next 20 General Elections, we will, quite certainly, become a nation and he would realize his vision through his single, final act of sacrifice. And if one person is not enough, I would suggest that at least 81 of his colleagues follow suit and sacrifice themselves for the good of Singaporeans. I am waiting for Kuan Yew and his PAP colleagues to prove their worth through a noble sacrifice—or lose power, as Kuan Yew seems to think they would if they do not prove their worth. Perhaps Kuan Yew would find this hard to accept, but what is one hard truth for one man who has been bestowing us with so many hard truths over decades of leadership?

Blogged with the Flock Browser
Advertisements

15 Responses

  1. […] of Harry – Diary of A Singaporean Mind: The TRUTH about how long the PAP will last.. – Molitics: The Dummy Country’s Guide to Becoming a Nation – guanyinmiao’s musings: Politics In Singapore: Gauging Present Public Sentiments – TOC: Lee […]

  2. Now I am confused, we are only a nation if we are willing to die for each other. Well, the freaking foriegners who makes up one third of population will most probably die for money or his birth country. With lorryloads arriving everyday, we can stick the the notion of nation up the old man’s ass

  3. OMFG Molly you are too funny!!!

  4. First, lky accused us of being complacent, next he wants to dig spurs into our sides
    and followed through by naming us ‘daft’. Now he wants us to die to prove to him that HE has created a nation!

    These are the throes of a fading man who can no longer hold his own without his better half at his side to check him.

    • He didn’t say that he wanted us to prove it lah. But that doesn’t mean no one wants him to prove it for us.

  5. Nice and funny piece Molly. And it is true.

    It really amazes me that a leader can continue to insult the people by such giving such a definition of nation.

    What have the leader and his cronies sacrificed in nation-building? Certainly not with their lifes literally. With their world’s highest pay packets and near life-long employment, the dear leader is asking whether people are willing to die for one another in the name of nationhood. Is he saying that he and his cronies are themselves not ready to sacrifice themselves for sake of nation-building? Hence, the question in the first place?

    I think he has got it all wrong. A true nation is one where it takes care of ALL its own kind first. Leaders have to lead in this area and also lead by example. It is twisted logic to welcome huge number of foreigners, but leave vulnerable locals to fend for themselves. It is sick to then ask if one is willing to die for another.

    In his perverse logic, the leader has now expose his true colours as your article have so clearly demonstrated.

    Good job.

    • “A true nation is one where it takes care of ALL its own kind first. ”

      And not berate some of their kind for not being in possession of certain smarts manifest in fancy papers from institutions, and so much more.

  6. Kudos to the PAP. We are almost a nation already, cause we are dying under their rule, err.. world-class governance.

  7. “One People, One Nation, One Singapore”

    Remember this national slogan a few years back. Now this biggest dud of all Singaporeans says we are not a nation yet, re-writing history in a manner only he deems fit.

    WTF is he talking ? Then why is he & son each drawing a salary so monstrous that no reputable leader of any other NATION has ever drawn.

    His mouth is used for spewing shit only.

  8. I like the articles here, well argued. At some point, I felt the contents are too sharp for the man to accept. The question is what do you do to someone who lets off such illogical outbursts through the media ? Much as I am curious to know who Mollymeek is (no other reason other than for the wonderful articles written), I think it is best to keep the identity a secret in order to avoid being struck. Keep the articles coming 🙂

  9. Ah Fart has the gall to pay hisself more than any leader in any NATION when Sunkenpore is only a CITY ?!?!?!

    What The F !!!

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: